|
|
back to boardNo AC since 19-Feb-2002 (Even program that got AC on 18-Feb-2002 gets now WA) Re: I agree with you. I am trying to get AC.. all possible ways; It is obvious that the solution uses Horner's scheme the output is ambiguous: for example for n = 2 the following two outputs are correct: 2 1 0 * X + * X + 0 X * 1 + X * 2 + so which one to output ? I've tried both but WA; I really think the admins should recheck this problem's tests.. and clarify the problem's description. Could admin give a reply??? Now maybe no one know hot to solve this problem. Posted by aaakkk 28 Mar 2002 19:23 Admins rarely reply here.... send'em mail to acm@timus.ru > Re: Those outputs are wrong. For instanse, your first output written in usual way looks like that: 2*(1*0+X)+X that is equal to 2*1*0+2*X+X I don't think it resembles the true output very much. > I agree with you. > I am trying to get AC.. all possible ways; > > It is obvious that the solution uses Horner's scheme > > the output is ambiguous: for example > > for n = 2 the following two outputs are correct: > > 2 > 1 > 0 > * > X > + > * > X > + > > 0 > X > * > 1 > + > X > * > 2 > + > > so which one to output ? I've tried both but WA; > > I really think the admins should recheck this problem's tests.. > and clarify the problem's description. > > |
|
|