|
|
back to boardspot check shows me that it should be 7 am i right? then the answer is 8 moves?? EGGS=2, FLOORS=20 (20 eggs, initial step = 7) e=20(20) 7 14 17 18 19 e=19(20) 7 14 17 18 19 (+7, +3) ...(e=18..14 ) e=13(20) 7 14 8 9 10 11 12 13 [7 moves] (20 eggs, initial step = 7) (20 eggs, initial step = 6) e=5(20) 6 1 2 3 4 5 e=17(20) 6 12 18 13 14 15 16 17 [8 moves] (20 eggs, initial step = 5) e=20(20) 5 10 15 18 19 20 e=17(20) 5 10 15 18 16 17 e=14(20) 5 10 15 11 12 13 14
(20 eggs, initial step = 4) 4 8 12 16 20 17 18 .. thanks! also what is the algorithm for this particular test case? thanks or maybe step is not fixed at all? like step0=7, step1=6, step2=5? +6 +5 +4 +3 6 11 15 18 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 10(or 11) 6 11 7 8 9 10 14(or 15) 6 11 15 12 13 14 17(or 18) 6 11 15 18 16 17 20 6 11 15 18 19 20 hmm for 2 eggs / 20 floors the answer is 6, this is weird Edited by author 16.03.2016 05:21 2eggs 100floors (14) +14 +13 +12 +11 +10 +9 +8 +7 14 27 39 41 52 62 71 80 88 95 39 14 27 39 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 100 14 27 39 41 52 62 71 80 88 95 96 97 98 99 IIRC for this task we need to save the last egg at all costs, until the moment we figure out the exact answer. For 2 eggs / 20 floors, that would be: 1st try: 6, and if breaks — 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 in worst case for last egg (so it breaks when we figure out the answer for sure). 2nd: 11, if breaks — 7, 8, 9, 10. 3rd: 14, if breaks — 11, 12, 13. 4th: 17, if breaks — 15, 16 5th: 19, if breaks — 18. 6th: 20 So in worst case, 6 tries. Then again, i didn't solve it yet, so i can't guarantee anything, but that's how i understood it from previous discussions. And yeah, you already described it above, i didn't read. Sorry. Edited by author 16.03.2016 06:26 the direction is right, step0 is the answer, for 2 eggs dunno for 3 eggs also coz i не решил еще тоже Well, intuitively, with 3 eggs we should put the first one in the middle, to minimize a floor quantity in worst case for remaining two eggs? intuitively this is DP problem with precomputing table of 1001x1001 cells row 1 contain values -1 1 2 3 4 5 .. row 2 contain values -1 1 2 2 3 3 .. row 3 ?? with 3 eggs we do move0 somewhere in the middle, doing loop from Eggs to 1, computing min(row1[step1]+row2[step22]) (or minimize step1+step2, maybe) for 3 eggs: for (step2=e; step2>1; step2--) for (step1=i2; step1>1; step1--) row 2 : -1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 .. |
|
|