|
|
вернуться в форумIf you have WA #9 First I used Kruskal algo but got WA9 verdict. My program didn't give right answer for next test: 4 1 4 0 1 1 100000 1 0 1 100000 1 1 0 100000 100000 100000 100000 0 right answer: 100002 Implementation of Prim algo gave the correct answer at last. Re: If you have WA #9 HM, i have right output on this test, but WA 9 Re: If you have WA #9 c[i][j] = c[j][i] This is wrong test Re: If you have WA #9 This test helped me.... 5 2 1 3 0 1 2 3 4 1 0 2 3 4 2 2 0 3 4 3 3 3 0 4 4 4 4 4 0 =8 (I was getting 9). Basically my algorithm (roughly Prim's) tried to short-cut checking vertex weights. For any node, make sure you check verices to ALL nodes.... HM, i have right output on this test, but WA 9 Re: If you have WA #9 Послано lrdx 27 окт 2015 20:10 Some tests: 4 2 1 4 0 4 8 9 4 0 2 7 8 2 0 1 9 7 1 0 Answer 3 4 2 1 3 0 6 7 8 6 0 2 3 7 2 0 4 8 3 4 0 Answer 5 Edited by author 27.10.2015 20:10 Re: If you have WA #9 5 3 1 3 2 0 1 2 3 4 1 0 2 3 4 2 2 0 3 4 3 3 3 0 4 4 4 4 4 0 answer is 7 Edited by author 19.02.2019 12:09 Re: If you have WA #9 One more test that helped me to find my error for WA #9. 5 2 1 5 0 1 100 150 200 1 0 10 50 200 100 10 0 11 100 150 50 11 0 2 200 200 100 2 0 Answer: 13 |
|
|