|
|
вернуться в форумalgorithm the main idea is that: if we have 2*3 sized grid we can erase top or bottom row. ... we can get either ... ... or ... using this: let's say that n<m. if n%3==0 we can convert n*m to n*3 and the n*3 to 3*3 same approach also works when m%3==0. 3*3 grid is elementary grid which we can get minimum 2 stones from it. if n%3==1 AND m%3==1 example .... .... .... .... cut this into .... .... ...^ ..^^ ^... ^... ^..^ ^.^^ ^... ^... ^..^ ^.^^ ^... ^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^ (^ means erased stone.) After this we can get 1 stone easily. cut 1*3 pieces in first column vertically,then in bottom rows horizontally,then upper rows vertically until this figure achieved. if n%3==1 AND m%3==2 example ..... ..... ..... ..... cut this into ..... ..... ..... ....^ ...^^ ^.... ^^... ^^... ^^..^ ^^.^^ ^.... ^^... ^^... ^^..^ ^^.^^ ^.... ^^... ^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^ from this figure we can get 1 also. cut 1*3 pieces from 1nd and 2nd columns vertically,then bottom rows horizontally and upper rows vertically. if n%3==2 AND m%3==2 example ..... (finally) ...^^ ..... (finally) ...^^ ..... (finally) ^^.^^ ..... (finally) ^^^^^ ..... (finally) ^^^^^ cut 1*3 pieces vertically from 1nd and 2nd columns,then horizontally from bottom rows and vertically from upper rows.then we can reduce this grid into 1 stone. AND finally,if n==1 or m==1 the answer is ceil(n/2); Edited by author 13.06.2011 22:04 Edited by author 13.06.2011 22:05 Edited by author 13.06.2011 22:07 Edited by author 13.06.2011 22:07 Re: algorithm Why the answer of (3m, n) is same as (3, n). Maybe we can solve (3m, n) for 1, but (3, 3) only for 2. |
|
|