|
|
вернуться в форумRe: WA #5 Послано xay 16 ноя 2010 19:55 see the second sample on your site. the answer is 2. Re: WA #5 Any suggestions on improvement of the algorithm i use? Is my approach wrong or can be fine with some tweaking? Ravi Kiran. Re: WA #5 If in your current state s1[i]==s2[j], you should not assume states i+1,j and i,j+1. Only i+1,j+1. Re: WA #5 Thanks a lot everyone. I got accepted with the change you suggested. |
|
|