|
|
back to boardWA6 Posted by coder 4 Apr 2009 16:30 Please, give me some hint! Re: WA6 Posted by svr 21 Apr 2009 11:51 Standard Prim's(Greedy) algo works if we assign -d to edges in graph. Re: WA6 nothing special, just obtain a spanning tree (forest)... I think you made a confusion between verteces and parents, or something like that... try this example: 7 2 10 0000101 0000101 0001010 0010010 1100001 0011000 1100100 One of the correct answers is 16 00a000d 0000000 a0000d0 0000000 000000d 00d0000 d000d00 WA6 too Posted by whiord 6 Jul 2009 13:56 I've WA6 too. But on pervious test I've got AC. I use connected components of graph and Kruskal algo for builting spanning tree. Re: WA6 Try to estimate the maximal possible answer to this problem. Re: WA6 Thanks you. This test helped me to find the reason of WA6. Re: WA6 Had a very silly WA6, and none of tests from this or neighbouring topics helped, so here's the one that i finally thought of and which helped: 5 1 1 01000 10001 00010 00101 01010 (1-2, 2-5, 5-4, 4-3, result is all zeros.) I've been sleepy and lazy and did a bad job with a tree building algo, which i made like this: --- (mark vertices 1..N as unconnected) for i:=1 to N do for j:=1 to N do if (i, j) is an existing edge and either i or j is yet unconnected to anything, then add (i, j) to a tree and mark both i and j as connected. --- So then it adds 1-2, then 2-5, then 3-4, and then it appears that both 4 and 5 are already connected to something, and 4-5 isn't included to a tree, which is a mistake. Re: WA6 My programm have wa6? and on your test give: 16 0000000 000000d 000000a 00000d0 000000d 000d000 0da0d00 Is it correct? Re: WA6 Posted by LLL 2 Oct 2016 11:07 helpful!thx |
|
|