|  | 
|  | 
| back to board | WA#4... WHY? My algo is here... I wrote simple Binary search but got WA#4... Where is my mistake? Maybe there are some special cases... Can you help me, please? Thanks in advance...Re: WA#4... WHY? My algo is here... I had wa4 and this test helped me to get AC:6
 1 0 1 0 0 1
 6
 2 2 1
 1 1 1
 3 3 1
 4 4 1
 6 6 1
 4 5 1
 // correct answer is 011010
Re: WA#4... WHY? My algo is here... Try using the STL lower_bound for binary search. It really cuts down potential errors on edge cases. | 
 | 
|