|
|
back to boardA=B,B=C =>A=C? Posted by SPIRiT 8 Aug 2006 13:06 If A and B have analogous solution, and B and C have analogous solution, can we say what A and C have analogous solution? If so, the problem is simple, otherwise it's a graph problem... Re: A=B,B=C =>A=C? No :) If so the problem becomes too easy. You have only vertices and edges i.e. graph. This problem is equivalent to problem about matching in biseparated graph. Edited by author 08.08.2006 14:26 Re: A=B,B=C =>A=C? Posted by SPIRiT 10 Aug 2006 14:19 What if there are several unconnected graphs? Perhaps I should connect them to get the needed matching (N vertices of one color, N of another).... Re: A=B,B=C =>A=C? You have to find maximum matching. If its size less than N then "IMPOSSIBLE". What difficults can appear if graph is unconncted? Re: A=B,B=C =>A=C? Posted by SPIRiT 11 Aug 2006 14:58 Okay, the problem of maximum matching is described at Cormen (Ford-Fulkerson algo). But I used another idea. First of all I checked each connected part of the graph (painted it with BFS into black and white). Wherefore I found if the graph is biseparated. After that we have obviously another problem. We have pairs of integers (x1,y1), (x2,y2), (x3,y3) .. (xm,ym). The total sum of all numbers is 2*n. The pair can be inversed. We need to find a combination 100001001 (m digits), such that b1+b2+b3+b4+..bm=N, where bi=xi if i-th digit is 0 and yi otherwise. I used Dinamic programming for that and got WA. Why such approach does not work? (If you want, I can send you my code). Edited by author 11.08.2006 14:59 Edited by author 11.08.2006 14:59 |
|
|