I have spend more than an hour, but... (+)
My solution is correct, but I still cannot solve this problem fast. Maybe the time limit should be increased? I doubt it is an optimization problem.
AC! The time limit may be beaten. Yes-s-s... ;) (-)
Re: I have spend more than an hour, but... (+)
It's not an optimization problem, it's just an easy math problem:
AC in 0.001 ;)
Re: it's just an easy math problem
Is your solution O(1)?
If so I want to know it ;) As for me I cannot deduce the formula (-)
Re: it's just an easy math problem
Is your solution O(1)?
Yes
Re: If so I want to know it ;) As for me I cannot deduce the formula (-)
Posted by
Akcium 28 Mar 2006 00:46
We have 3 cones. 1 with round bottom and 2 with parabolic bottom.
Edited by author 28.03.2006 00:47
Wow! It is SUPER solution! (+)
I spend whole day for finding formula by treble intagrals, but all what I got was cumbersome formulas, and when i read you hint I solved it immediately :-)... I was SO happy :-)
THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!
Re: Wow! It is SUPER solution! (+)
Really a good hint. I was really surprised when found that volumes of both cones with parabollic bottoms are EQUAL =)
Re: Wow! It is SUPER solution! (+)
Posted by
svr 15 Oct 2007 18:53
Better to use Simpson numeric integration by height with respect to area of horizontal segment of circle of constant width.
Edited by author 15.10.2007 19:14
Edited by author 15.10.2007 19:14
Re: Wow! It is SUPER solution! (+)