Discussion @ 1430. Crime and Punishment @ Timus Online Judge

Why WA on #24

Posted by The Punisher 1 Mar 2006 16:31

First I got TL on #24
Then I got WA on #24
Are there large answer?
Thanks.

Re: Why WA on #24

Posted by Igor E. Tuphanov 1 Mar 2006 16:37

No. No large answer. How could it be large? Everything is quite simple. You can solve this problem occasionally, even if not think much.

Re: Why WA on #24

Posted by The Punisher 1 Mar 2006 18:51

I try to took "j" goods for A$ and goods for B$ on rest money.
Then I try to took "j" goods for B$ and goods for A$ on rest money.
0<="j"<=min(n/a,b)
What's wrong?
My single idea :my code can generate negative numbers as answer.
I don't understand anything...

Re: Why WA on #24

Posted by The Punisher 15 Jan 2007 23:31

got AC

Discussion of Problem 1430. Crime and Punishment