Discussion @ 1262. Pseudo-Roman Number @ Timus Online Judge

I think that something is wrong in this problem...

Posted by Bandera 1 Apr 2005 16:12

If n=20000 i think that are no psevdo-roman number to represent n. What i have print in this case? May be 0?

Edited by author 01.04.2005 19:42

Re: I think that something is wrong in this problem...

Posted by Burunduk1 1 Apr 2005 19:59

Why there is no such number?
My AC solution works right in this case.

Re: I think that something is wrong in this problem...

Posted by Bandera 1 Apr 2005 20:06

Than please write answer of your problem if n=20000.

Burunduk1 wrote 1 April 2005 19:59

Why there is no such number?
My AC solution works right in this case.

Re: I think that something is wrong in this problem...

Posted by Burunduk1 1 Apr 2005 20:21

It's 2 :)

Discussion of Problem 1262. Pseudo-Roman Number