|
|
back to boardML on test #10!!! But program should not use more 450K. HELP! See code inside. Should correct algo use not more than 400K? Help need. const maxnumel = 10; maxm = 1000; maxel = (100000 div maxnumel) + 1; good : set of char = ['A'..'Z']; var stack : array[1..maxm] of integer; next : array[1..maxel] of integer; data : array[1..maxel, 1..maxnumel] of integer; size : array[1..maxm] of byte; ch : char; n, i, num, stacknum : integer; free : integer; st : string; procedure readword(var st : string); begin read(ch); st := ''; while not(ch in good) do read(ch); while ch in good do begin st := st + ch; read(ch); end; end; begin fillchar(stack, sizeof(stack), 0); fillchar(size, sizeof(size), 0); read(n); free := 0; for i := 1 to n do begin readword(st); if st = 'PUSH' then begin readln(stacknum, num); if (size[stacknum] > 0)and(size[stacknum] < maxnumel) then begin inc(size[stacknum]); data[stack[stacknum]][size[stacknum]] := num; end else begin inc(free); next[free] := stack[stacknum]; stack[stacknum] := free; size[stacknum] := 1; data[free, 1] := num; end; end else begin read(stacknum); if size[stacknum] < 1 then begin stack[stacknum] := next[stack[stacknum]]; size[stacknum] := maxnumel; end; writeln(data[stack[stacknum], size[stacknum]]); dec(size[stacknum]); end; end; end. Thanks for attention! Edited by author 02.08.2004 12:43 This problem can not be accepted on Pascal. :( Use C or C++... SizeOf(Integer) = 4. Use SmallInt. After adding type integer = smallint it gets WA: 711430 19:20:44 4 окт 2004 TECTOBOP 1220 Pascal Wrong Answer 3 0.015 409 КБ Edited by author 04.10.2004 19:21 Re: SizeOf(Integer) = 4. Use SmallInt. Hmmm... Citation from statement : "...and B is an integer (0 <= B <= 10^9)...". So it's impossible to use _only_ smallint type in program, is not it? But you are right, my solution has little bug :). But I got ML on test#10 again after fixing it. And only after submitting it on C++ I finally got AC. In any case, i think that "Stacks" is one of the worst problems on acm.timus.ru... :((( Problemsolvers, who use C, have some superiority. 450+373=823 - it's to much for this problem Edited by author 06.10.2004 20:09 Re: 450+373=823 - it's to much for this problem I realized fully it :) |
|
|