|
|
back to boardMy algorithm is too slow.It takes more than 0.6sec.So,somebody got AC less than 0.3sec,would you please send your progeam to me?(yym2008@hotmail.com) Mine is 0.46 sec, but it is only 1.5 KBytes in size (-) How to do?Can you explain?By the way,I remember you said that you can solve Ural1090 in O(n).How can you do it?Mine is O(nlogn). Re: My algorithm is too slow.It takes more than 0.6sec.So,somebody got AC less than 0.3sec,would you please send your progeam to me?(yym2008@hotmail.com) Mine is 0.156s. I use searching and some calculation. I think maybe you got an slow algrithm with only searching. Re: My algorithm is too slow.It takes more than 0.6sec.So,somebody got AC less than 0.3sec,would you please send your progeam to me?(yym2008@hotmail.com) I got AC in 0.14 sec and didn't use any kind of special things. Just stupid counting Hmin and Hmax for each point of the matrix simple algorithm Posted by ASK 18 Mar 2018 00:55 now it is 0.031 s sorting stations by radius does not change anything |
|
|