|
|
| Show all threads Hide all threads Show all messages Hide all messages | | wa 6 | 👑TIMOFEY👑`~ | 1689. Fisherman and Barbell | 10 Jul 2024 12:17 | 1 | wa 6 👑TIMOFEY👑`~ 10 Jul 2024 12:17 | | Test #16 | Alexander Kouprin | 1689. Fisherman and Barbell | 27 Jan 2012 23:37 | 6 | Test #16 Alexander Kouprin 5 Mar 2009 03:41 If you have some troubles with passing 16th test, try
20 3
10 5
5
1 4 8 12 16 Re: Test #16 Vedernikoff Sergey (HSE: EconomicsForever!) 5 Mar 2009 15:18 I've passed test 16, but stuck on 17...
And, by the way, what is right answer on your test? If my solution is correct(it got AC),then it's 0 I'm can't pass test #22 :( This tests very helped me to pass test #16 and test #22:
7 3
5 2
1
1
answer 0
7 4
6 2
1
1
answer 0
Edited by author 09.03.2009 14:55 Could you explain please how to get answer 0 in your tests?
like in 1st for example:
worm is from 1 to 4 [1;4)
it means that empty part are only [0;1) and [4;7)
and I couldn't place the barbell without squashing the worm.
I'm wrong somewhere, please tell me. | | Wrong Answer #3 | Reza | 1689. Fisherman and Barbell | 14 Mar 2010 03:50 | 4 | Hi,
I got WA at test #3. I have applied all of the samples above to the algorithm and the program output the correct result. Any body can help me?
I meant by above to the samples in the last posts. Here are some tests that helped me pass test number 3:
Input:
8 2
4 1
7
0 0 2 3 4 6 6
Output:
2
Input:
10 2
4 1
5
0 1 4 7 8
Output:
3
Input:
20 20
2 1
1
0
Output:
0
Here are some tests that helped me pass test number 3:
Input:
8 2
4 1
7
0 0 2 3 4 6 6
Output:
2
Input:
10 2
4 1
5
0 1 4 7 8
Output:
3
Input:
20 20
2 1
1
0
Output:
0
first and second tests are not correct. Worms cross themself. Edited by author 14.03.2010 03:51 | | Test #8 TLE | melkiy | 1689. Fisherman and Barbell | 7 Sep 2009 03:10 | 1 | What this test may contain?
I find a solution O(N). On large tests on my PC i get 0.046s at N=100000, but on timus i have TLE...
I can send my solution if anybody would be so kind to look at it :) | | If you have WA on #16 | yuyan | 1689. Fisherman and Barbell | 6 Apr 2009 13:15 | 1 | Please try this test.This test helps me a lot.
20 3
2 1
5
1 4 8 12 16
The answer is 0. | | Algo? | melkiy | 1689. Fisherman and Barbell | 9 Mar 2009 15:05 | 3 | Algo? melkiy 6 Mar 2009 04:35 My step-by-step barbell moving (though improved to add into under and out under the barbell only "right" worms without checking every worm) gives TLE on 8th test.
Is segment tree needed? I solved without it.I also used "improved step-by-step barbell moving",but my solution was quite far from TLE. I modeled groove as int array,but if you use sorting on worms array and then search there some coordinates then you can possibly get TLE.
Edited by author 06.03.2009 05:20 I solved this problem without sorting. I found difference
d[this_step]=count[this_step]-count[prev_step],
and after that
count_squash_worm=count_squash_worm+d[this_step].
Edited by author 09.03.2009 15:06 | | Problem discription | A.Z | 1689. Fisherman and Barbell | 1 Mar 2009 23:03 | 4 | If a worm with length 1 has distance 1 from the left edge of the groove, it will be in range from 1cm to 2cm. if we put the barbell with in distance 2 from left side of groove (left edge of left plate lay on coordinate 2 ) does it squash the worm? No, because a worm will be lay in range [1,2) And if just after the barbel? I.e., if the barbel ends at 2, and I put worm at the distance 2, will it squash the worm? |
|
|
|
